ARNOLD P. PALMER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Watson Grene v. State, 702 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …elates to the possession of a controlled substance, habitual offender sentencing was improper. See § 775.084(l)(a)(3); Williams v. State, 667 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Houser v. [*511] State, 666 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Palmer v. State, 664 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Jackson v. State, 651 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Perez v. State, 647 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); cf. Tucker v. State, 608 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), aff'd on other grounds, 620 So. 2d 1241 (Fla.1993). Accordingly,…
• Nieves v. State, 678 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …the effective date of the amendment. A public defender’s fee was imposed as condition 17 without appellant being advised of the right to object to the amount of the fee. See, e.g., Cruz v. State, 669 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Palmer v. State, 664 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). We reject the state’s argument that notice was not required since appellant had agreed to pay a fee in the written plea agreement, [*470] because the amount of the fee was not part of the agreement, nor was there an express waiv…
• Hayward Hardy v. State, 677 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …irm the judgment and sentence, but strike the public defender’s fee, as the record fails to show that appellant was advised of his right to object to the amount as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). See also Palmer v. State, 664 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the fee after compliance with the rule. We also note that the sentence form was not checked to indicate appellant was sentenced as an habitual felony offender and remand to correct this sc…