EDDIE DOWDELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EDDIE DOWDELL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
665 So. 2d 279
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
WOLF, Judge.
Appellant challenges his convictions for burglary, battery upon a person over the age of 65, and an aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The issue is whether the trial court erred in allowing appellant to represent himself at trial without conducting adequate inquiry into the waiver of counsel. We find that the trial court failed to adequately inquire concerning appellant’s mental condition, age, education, past history, or ability prior to letting him represent himself at trial. In accordance with Burton v. State, 596 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), we are forced to reverse and remand for a new trial.
LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 971 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…ce with criminal proceedings, or other factors bearing upon his capacity to waive his constitutional right to counsel. See Wilson v. State, 724 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Toussaint v. State, 677 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Dowdell v. State, 665 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Hadden v. State, 633 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The appellant’s convictions are accordingly reversed, and this case is remanded. ALLEN, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.…
-
Scotty's, Inc. v. Olivieri, 713 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…he hearing on the motion to compel was furnished to us. Absent a transcript, we must assume that either no proper objection was made by Scotty’s or that a sufficient showing of need and undue hardship was made. Inapro, Inc. v. Alex Hofrichter, P.A., 665 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), rev. dismissed, 675 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 1996). See also Arthur v. Gibson, 654 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (certiorari denied where petitioner failed to supply transcript of hearing, so correctness of trial court’s ruling must be…
-
Paracelsus Santa Rosa Med. Ctr. v. Hulsey, 709 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Inapro, Inc., v. Alex Hofrichter, P.A., 665 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), rev. dismissed, 675 So. 2d 120 (Fla.1996); see also, Arthur v. Gibson, 654 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Burton v. State, 596 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)