FLORIDA LIME GROWERS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, WILLIAM P. PLANES, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
BLOOMER PLASTICS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-01-10
No. 94-2540
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
665 So. 2d 1151 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the amended final judgment entered in favor of appellee by default after the trial court struck the appellants’ pleadings as a sanction for failing to comply and/or timely comply with various orders of the court. The severity of the sanction must be commensurate with the violation, and dismissal of an action should be imposed upon a party only in extreme situations for flagrant or aggravated cases of disobedience. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944, 946 (Fla.1983); Summit Chase Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Protean Investors, Inc., 421 So. 2d 562, 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Based upon our review of the record, the imposition of this ultimate sanction by the court below was far too severe a response to the appellants’ transgressions. See, e.g., Turano v. Michael Pirates World, Inc., 659 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Coppola v. McNab, 540 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

We therefore reverse the amended final judgment and direct the court to reinstate appellants’ pleadings for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Blackford v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 681 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …of the court, or conduct which evinces deliberate callousness.’” Gomez-Bonilla v. Apollo Ship Chandlers, Inc., 650 So. 2d 116, 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(quoting Mercer, 443 So. 2d at 946); see also Florida Lime Growers, Inc. v. Bloomer Plastics, Inc., 665 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Reep v. Reep, 565 So. 2d 814, 816 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Pilkington plc v. Metro Corp., 526 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Zafirakopoulous v. South Miami Int’l Crabhouse Corp., 513 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Beauchamp v. Collin…
  • Jalil v. Merkury Corp., 683 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …a sanction for a first time discovery violation, and where there were other lesser sanctions available. Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla.1993); Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla.1983); Florida Lime Growers, Inc. v. Bloomer Plastics, Inc., 665 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). For these reasons, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the plaintiffs’ verified emergency motion to set aside the order granting defendant Merkury Corporation’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint and to st…
  • Inez Munoz v. Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd., 692 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
    …versed for trial. Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla.1993); K&K World Enter, v. Union Spol, 692 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Garlock, Inc. v. Harriman, 665 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Florida Lime Growers, Inc. v. Bloomer Plastics, Inc., 665 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Gomez- [*1005] Bonilla v. Apollo Ship Chandlers, Inc., 650 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw