ISAAC JOHNSON, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ISAAC JOHNSON, III, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
666 So. 2d 246
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Isaac Johnson appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. In his motion, Johnson has raised nine grounds for relief. In its order denying the motion, the trial court stated that Johnson was not entitled to relief but did not provide any explanation or analysis. The trial court attached various sentencing documents and mandates from this court but they do not explain or support the trial court’s denial of the motion.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand. Based on the nature of Johnson’s facially sufficient claims, he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on remand.
BLUE, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pena v. FOX, 198 So. 3d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…ere insurer’s proposed releases deviated from settlement offer’s terms, noting “[i]t is the presence of the language in the proposed releases, not the effectiveness of the terms themselves, that [did] not comply with the offer”); Akileh v. Elchahal, 666 So. 2d 246, 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (holding that husband’s “subjective intent” at the time he entered into a marital settlement agreement “is not material in construing the contract”). The words are what matter because they will control who will, or will not,…
-
Glosser v. Nivia Vasquez, 898 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…rs to return the share to Vasquez. The defendants’ appeal follows. On appeal, the defendants contend that the trial court erred in finding that there was no enforceable contract. We review the trial court’s findings de novo. See Akileh v. Elchahal, 666 So. 2d 246, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The creation of a contract requires that there be a mutual or reciprocal assent to a certain and definite proposition, which is commonly referred to as a “meeting of the minds.” Hewitt v. Price, 222 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA…
-
Fauzia Parbeen v. Bari (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)…f whether the Mahr agreement signed by the parties serves to bar the Former Wife from recovery of an amount greater than that specified in the agreement. See Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch, 133 So. 3d 1008, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Akileh v. Elchahal, 666 So. 2d 246, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Furthermore, we review the sufficiency of factual findings made by the trial court for competent, substantial evidence. § 61.075(3), Fla. Stat. (2020). 1 The trial court determined that “10,00,000” Taka had a United State…