LAZARO BONARD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Single Criminal Episode cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The denial of the petitioner’s 3.850 motion is hereby affirmed. However, because the trial court reserved ruling, pending resolution by the Florida Supreme Court, as to the third issue raised by the petitioner regarding the legality of enhancing sentences for multiple crimes committed during a single criminal episode by both sentencing a defendant as a habitual offender and ordering that the sentences be served consecutively, we remand this cause for disposition of this issue in accordance with State v. Hill, 660 So. 2d 1384 (Fla.1995), approving 645 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); State v. Parker, 660 So. 2d 1393 (Fla.1995), approving 651 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); and Simmons v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly S509 (Fla. Oct. 5, 1995), approving 650 So. 2d 126 (Fla.1995).
Affirmed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Patrice Ratcliffe v. State, 660 So. 2d 1384 (Fla. 1995)
- Hill v. State, 645 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- Simmons v. State, 650 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Parker v. State, 651 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Vernell v. Natividad Rivera, 651 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- State v. Nattress, 660 So. 2d 1393 (Fla. 1995)
- State v. Parker, 660 So. 2d 1393 (Fla. 1995)