ALAN A. FRIEND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1996-01-24
No. 94-2707
GUNTHER, C.J., FARMER and KLEIN, concur.
666 So. 2d 599 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for second degree grand theft and the sentence except for restitution. The evidence adduced by the state will support restitution of only the sum of $61,973, the amount of the check received by appellant in the scheme for which he stands convicted.

We follow the reasoning of Fitts v. State, 649 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), and strike the probationary condition of not using intoxicants to excess because the condition was not pronounced at sentencing. We also strike the imposition of public defender and county commission fees because, apart from the failure to consider the defendant’s ability to pay, there was no documentation of the fees as required by section 939.01, Florida Statute (1993). Lee v. State, 643 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; RESTITUTION AND COSTS REVERSED.

GUNTHER, C.J., FARMER and KLEIN, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Leander v. State, 58 So. 3d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …sider the motion for clarification as a motion to correct an illegal sentence, to the extent that he is arguing that there was no factual basis for his guilty plea, rule 3.800(a) motions are not used to resolve factual disputes. See Krawic v. State, 666 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). GROSS, C.J., WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw