MARK KRAWIC, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARK KRAWIC, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
666 So. 2d 599
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Such a motion does not contemplate resolution of a factual dispute, and any error must appear from the face of the record. State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983 (Fla.1995). Thus, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing a timely and properly sworn motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
GUNTHER, C.J., and POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Leander v. State, 58 So. 3d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…sider the motion for clarification as a motion to correct an illegal sentence, to the extent that he is arguing that there was no factual basis for his guilty plea, rule 3.800(a) motions are not used to resolve factual disputes. See Krawic v. State, 666 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). GROSS, C.J., WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 1995)