SHARON FLORES, APPELLANT,
v.
HUMBERTO FLORES, APPELLEE
SHARON FLORES, APPELLANT,
HUMBERTO FLORES, APPELLEE
666 So. 2d 605
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Sharon Flores appeals the final order denying her petition for modification of the dissolution decree. We have reviewed the record and affirm the lower court’s order except for that portion denying Ms. Flores’s motion for attorney’s fees. Both parties agree that they had stipulated below that the issue of attorney’s fees would be addressed at a subsequent hearing. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the court’s order denying Ms. Flores’s attorney’s fees and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Yolimar Jurasek v. Jurasek, 67 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…torney’s fees to be decided at a subsequent hearing, such an agreement is binding upon the court and ruling on the issue contrary to the stipulation is erroneous. See Kartzmark v. Kartzmark, 709 So. 2d 583, 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Flores v. Flores, 666 So. 2d 605, 605 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). [*1213] In sum, we reverse the entry of final judgment awarding the husband a “special equity” in the parties’ jointly owned marital residence and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opini…
-
Golliner v. Golliner (Fla. 2d DCA 2026)