MARY CATHERINE RAFOOL, APPELLANT,
v.
JACOB M. HARRIS, SHARON HINES HOFINGER, AND CLYDE HINES, ET AL., APPELLEES
MARY CATHERINE RAFOOL, APPELLANT,
JACOB M. HARRIS, SHARON HINES HOFINGER, AND CLYDE HINES, ET AL., APPELLEES
666 So. 2d 605
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Everton v. Willard, 468 So. 2d 936 (Fla.1985).
GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Yolimar Jurasek v. Jurasek, 67 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…torney’s fees to be decided at a subsequent hearing, such an agreement is binding upon the court and ruling on the issue contrary to the stipulation is erroneous. See Kartzmark v. Kartzmark, 709 So. 2d 583, 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Flores v. Flores, 666 So. 2d 605, 605 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). [*1213] In sum, we reverse the entry of final judgment awarding the husband a “special equity” in the parties’ jointly owned marital residence and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opini…
Authorities Cited
- Azor J. Everton, Jr. v. Willard, 468 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 1985)