MARY GETFORD VEZINA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1995-09-13
No. 95-251
WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
667 So. 2d 294 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence without discussion. However, on remand, the trial court is directed to enter an amended order revoking community control, stating the grounds upon which revocation was based following our previous remand.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bontrager v. State, 678 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
    …oral findings establishing the grounds for revocation, we remand for it to amend the written order to specify “the terms and conditions of probation that have been violated.” Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126, 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Vezina v. State, 667 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The appellant need not be present for this merely clerical correction. Edwards v. State, 668 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). AFFIRMING the judgment and sentence and REMANDING with directions to amend the written order to reci…
  • Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
    …er an amended order revoking community control, stating the terms and conditions of community control that have been violated. Houston v. State, 688 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Sanchez v. State, 675 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Vezina v. State, 667 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Robinson v. State, 609 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Frazier v. State, 571 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Clark v. State, 510 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The appellant nee…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw