UNIVERSITY CLUB, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
DEBORAH K. KOLB, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1995-10-24
No. 95-1875
MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
667 So. 2d 330 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.

ERVIN, Judge.

We reverse. Emergency One, Inc. v. Keffer, 652 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Kline v. Rubio, 652 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The matter is remanded with directions to the trial court to enter summary judgment in favor of appellant.

REVERSED.

MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • J.R.V. v. State, 715 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
    …free and intelligent; and 3) afford appellant an opportunity to enter a new plea to. the charges in the petition. See N.R.L. v. State, 684 So. 2d 299, 300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); J.H. v. State, 679 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); In Interest of D.L.A., 667 So. 2d 330, 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Appellant contends secondly that the trial court erred by failing to determine that he entered his plea freely and intelligently because it failed to determine a factual basis for the plea and because it failed to apprise…
  • P.L.S. v. State, 745 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …horough inquiry” contemplated by Rule 8.165(b)(2). See A.M. v. State, 723 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); J.R.V. v. State, 715 So. 2d 1135, 1139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); N.R.L. v. State, 684 So. 2d 299, 300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); In the Interest of D.L.A., 667 So. 2d 330, 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The court’s questioning of appellant was not sufficient to determine whether appellant’s waiver of counsel was made knowingly and intelligently in consideration of his age, education, experience, mental condition, and the n…
  • N.R.L. v. State, 684 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
    …gnment reflects that there was no “thorough inquiry” made into N.R.L.’s desire to waive his right to counsel, contrary to the requirement of Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165(b)(2). Accordingly, we must reverse. See In the Interest of D.L.A., 667 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that reversal is required where child was not advised of his right to counsel at each stage and no inquiry was made to determine whether waiver of that right was freely and intelligently made). Upon remand, the require…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw