DERRICK R. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-02-09
No. 95-03977
THREADGILL, C.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
667 So. 2d 941 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Derrick R. Williams, challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find merit only in his contention that his consecutive habitual felony offender sentences are illegal under Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), and State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983 (Fla.1995). The trial court denied relief to Williams on this claim without attaching any records to refute the allegation.

We reverse and remand for a determination of whether Williams’ sentences were imposed in violation of the prohibition against stacking habitual offender sentences for multiple offenses occurring during a single criminal episode. See Willis v. State, 640 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

THREADGILL, C.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. State, 685 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
    …s the trial court’s denial, on remand, of his motion for postconvic [*56] tion relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant’s motion was initially summarily denied by the trial court. This court, in Williams v. State, 667 So. 2d 941 (Fla.2d DCA 1996), reversed and remanded for a determination of whether under Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), appellant was unlawfully sentenced to consecutive habitual offende…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw