VINCENT LAMAR PHILPOT, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Alachua Reg'l Juv. Detention Ctr. v. T.O., 684 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 1996)
  …GRIMES, Justice. We have for review T.O. v. Alachua Regional Juvenile Detention Center, 668 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), wherein the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance: WHEN A PERSON IS DETAINED BY AN ORDER ISSUED IN ONE CIRCUIT AND THE DETAINING PARTY IS WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF ANOTHER…
• A.M.W. v. Portesy, 714 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
  …order a successive twenty-one-day detention in this manner would ignore the established principle that a juvenile cannot be detained for longer than twenty-one days on the same offense. See, e.g., T.O. v. Alachua Regional Juvenile Detention Center, 668 So. 2d 243, 245 (Fla. 1st DCA), aff'd, 684 So. 2d 814 (Fla.1996); L.J. v. Fryer, 565 So. 2d 713, 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Because the second detention of A.M.W. was unauthorized, A.M.W. was entitled to immediate relief, which was granted by prior order of th…
• Philpot v. State, 183 So. 3d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
  …hilpot claims is “newly-discovered” is precisely the same evidence Philpot relied upon when he filed his previous claims in 1994 and in 2010. The lower court denied relief of the 1994 claim and, on appeal, this Court affirmed. See, Philpot v. State, 668 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Philpot filed a second motion in 2010," alleging additional “newly-discovered” evidence. The trial court conducted an evi-dentiary hearing and denied the motion on the merits. On appeal, this Court affirmed, finding the trial cou…

Authorities Cited

• Millbrook Invs., N.V. v. Roth, 469 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)