THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
GAIL ROMEIS DAVIS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Moving a child from a semi-public area to a private location to facilitate a robbery constitutes kidnapping when the confinement has significance independent of the taking and is not inconsequential.
[1] A confinement that moves a victim from a semi-public area to a secluded location to facilitate the commission of a felony has significance independent of the taking and s…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the showing that the defendant took the child from an at least semi-public waiting room to a private examining room of a doctor's office, where she took jewelry from the child, may be found to have constituted an imprisonment...which was not 'inconsequential' and had 'significance independent' of the taking so as to support the separate charge of kidnapping”
Court's explanation of why the confinement satisfied the elements of kidnapping
The defendant took a five-year-old child from a semi-public waiting room in a doctor's office to a private examining room, where she took jewelry from…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Kidnapping Definition cases and more on FLexlaw
[*324] SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The state appeals from an order granting the defendant’s “(c)(4)” motion to dismiss a count of an information charging kidnapping under section 787.01(l)(a)2
, Florida Statutes (1993), by confining the five-year-old victim to facilitate the commission of a robbery.2 We reverse because, contrary to the decision below, the showing that the defendant took the child from an at least semi-public waiting room to a private examining room of a doctor’s office, where she took jewelry from the child, may be found to have constituted an imprisonment (by definition, against the will of the child, § 787.01(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993); Lafleur v. State, 661 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)) which was not “inconsequential” and had “significance independent” of the taking so as to support the separate charge of kidnapping. See Faison v. State, 426 So. 2d 963, 965-66, (Fla.1983), aff'g, 399 So. 2d 19, 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (kidnapping established because movements of victim from open area to secluded one made crime substantially easier to commit and reduced risk of detection); Black v. State, 630 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), review denied, 639 So. 2d 976 (Fla.1994); Tutt v. State, 620 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Gay v. State, 607 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), review denied, 620 So. 2d 760 (Fla.1993); Rodriguez v. State, 558 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
. 787.01 Kidnapping; kidnapping of child under age 13, aggravating circumstances
(l)(a) The term "kidnapping” means forcibly, secretly, or by threat confining, abducting, or imprisoning another person against his will and without lawful authority, with intent to:
* * * * *
2. Commit or facilitate commission of any felony.
.
COUNT 2
And the aforesaid Assistant State Attorney, under oath, further information makes that GAIL ROMEIS DAVIS on or about DECEMBER 08, 1994, in the County and State aforesaid, without lawful authority did then and there forcibly, secretly, or by threat, confine, abduct or imprison another person, to wit: T.D. (A MINOR) against that person's will and/or said victim being under the age of thirteen (13) years and said confinement was without the consent of said victim’s parent or legal guardian, with the intent to commit or facilitate the commission of any felony, to wit: ROBBERY, in violation of s. 787.01, Fla. Stat., contrary to the form of the Statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE v. State, 770 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…e the confinement, abduction or imprisonment required to establish any form of kidnapping. § 787.01(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). See Faison v. State, 399 So. 2d 19, 20-21 n. 2 & 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), approved, 426 So. 2d 963 (Fla.1983); State v. Davis, 668 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); cf. Simpkins v. State, 395 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Accordingly, the convictions under review are affirmed. As the parties agree, however, the defendant’s sentence as a violent career criminal is vacated in accordance wit…
Authorities Cited
- Faison v. State, 426 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 1983)
- Black v. State, 630 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Hollice Lafleur v. State, 661 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Stevens v. State, 399 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- GAY v. State, 607 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Rodriguez v. State, 558 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- Cordell Tutt v. State, 620 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)