ALPHONSO RODDY, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ALPHONSO RODDY, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
668 So. 2d 995
Florida Supreme Court (1996)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Roddy v. State, 658 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in State v. Daniel, 665 So. 2d 1040 (Fla.1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Daniel, the decision below is approved.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Daniel, 665 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 1995)
- Alphonso Roddy v. State, 658 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)