PRESTIGE PRINTING AH CORP., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-02-21
No. 95-961
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
668 So. 2d 1052 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit either in appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of section 287.042(2)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), see Carter v. Sparkman, 335 So. 2d 802 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041, 97 S.Ct. 740, 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Griffith v. Vecchiarelli, 97 So. 2d 691 (Fla.1957), or its com plaints about the manner in which it was applied by the D.O.T. Cf. ABI Walton Ins. Co. v. State Dep’t of Management Servs., 641 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (reversal required only because bidder not given reasonable opportunity to post § 287.042(2)(c) bond in appropriate amount).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw