M.U., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-02-23
No. 94-03266
SCHOONOVER, Acting C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.
668 So. 2d 1057 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Judge.

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant challenges his adjudication of guilt for aggravated assault with a firearm and trespass and his commitment to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. We find no error in the appellant’s adjudication and commitment and therefore affirm. However, as the appellant correctly argues, the trial court erred in imposing a general sentence for two separate offenses. See T.A.R. v. State, 640 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); H.L.L. v. State, 595 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we remand for the entry of a separate disposition order for each offense.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, Acting C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Daron Taree Black v. State, 698 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
    …DCA 1995). Since the trial court’s order of summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief did not contain any attachments to refute appellant’s claim, we reverse and remand for further proceedings on this issue. See Hunter v. State, 668 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). If the trial court again summarily denies the appellant’s motion, it must attach those portions of the record or files refuting this claim. Hunter, 668 So. 2d at 1058. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings c…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw