GREGORY SKEEN AND WILMA SKEEN, ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, BRIAN SKEEN, APPELLANTS,
v.
VICTOR M. FERRER, JR. AND JILL FERRER, ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, JORDAN FERRER, APPELLEES
GREGORY SKEEN AND WILMA SKEEN, ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, BRIAN SKEEN, APPELLANTS,
VICTOR M. FERRER, JR. AND JILL FERRER, ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, JORDAN FERRER, APPELLEES
669 So. 2d 304
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Snow v. Nelson, 475 So. 2d 225 (Fla.1985); Gissen v. Goodwill, 80 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1955).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Sibley, 885 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…s, when there is indeed a final earlier adjudication, its “effect ... as res judicata is not confined in its operation to subsequent independent' proceedings, but also applies to all collateral proceedings in the same action.” Utterback v. Starkey, 669 So. 2d 304, 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (footnotes and citations omitted). The former husband argues that it would work a manifest injustice for this court to enforce the March 4 order. The Florida Supreme Court “has long recognized that res judicata will not be i…
-
Barrero v. Ocean Bank, 729 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…similarly foreclose the relitigation of the issue of appellate attorney’s [*415] fees and costs. See Thomas v. Perkins, 723 So. 2d 293, (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Gomez-Ortega v. Dorten, Inc., 670 So. 2d 1107, 1108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Utterback v. Starkey, 669 So. 2d 304, 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). . This rule provides: (b) Enlargement. When an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time by order of the court, by these rules, or by notice given thereunder, for cause shown the court at any time…
-
Pelphrey-Weigand v. Weigand, 283 So. 3d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)…decretal proceeding, the Third District has observed that "it does not matter that the issue- preclusive effect of the earlier adjudication is asserted later in the same case, rather than in separate, subsequent litigation." Utterback v. Starkey, 669 So. 2d 304, 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Probably because res judicata principles in general apply only to final, appealable determinations, see 33 Fla. Jur. 2d Judgments & Decrees § 173 (1994), and successive final judgments in the same case are at least unusu…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Townsend v. State, 80 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1955)
- Snow v. Nelson, 475 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1985)