ARLENE RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
HEALTHSOUTH DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
ARLENE RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
HEALTHSOUTH DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
669 So. 2d 1058
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Finding that the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission reweighed the evidence in denying benefits to the appellant, we reverse with directions to enter an order confirming the findings of fact and award of the appeals referee. Holloman v. City of Quincy, 664 So. 2d 310 (1995); Barreto v. Taco Bell Corp., 661 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kerrigan v. State, 711 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…iced for temporary relief); Cooper v. Cooper, 406 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (reversing portion of final judgment of dissolution awarding appellee permanent alimony, where her petition did not raise issue of alimony); Noonan-Judson v. Surrency, 669 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (reversing final judgment determining appellant elected remedy by foreclosing note and mortgage and thus was not entitled to relief requesting express, resulting or constructive trust, in part because defendant had failed to plea…
-
Doerflein v. Anne Doerflein, 724 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…s need or the former husband’s ability to pay. The trial court could not properly rule on the issue without hearing such evidence. Because the issue of attorney’s fees was not litigated, the court’s ruling is reversed. Cf. Noonan-Judson v. Surrency, 669 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (judgment on issue not presented in pleading or litigated by parties voidable- on appeal). Moreover, the reversal of the former wife’s $17,038 judgment requires review of the fee issue. We are sure the trial court will consider…
-
Collins v. Bannon, 774 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…ither party raised it. A judgment may not be based on an issue that has not been framed by the pleadings, noticed for hearing, or litigated by the parties. See Gordon v. Gordon, 543 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); see also Noonan-Judson v. Surrency, 669 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). In Spencer v. Devine, 364 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), the trial court found that an agreement between the parties was void ab initio, because it was so vague and ambiguous that no meeting of the minds ever existed. The First…
Authorities Cited
- Raphael A. Barreto v. Taco Bell Corp. & Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 661 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Holloman v. The City OF Quincy & the State of Fla., 664 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)