MICHAEL WHITFIELD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL WHITFIELD, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
669 So. 2d 1131
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Carroll v. State, 497 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 511 So. 2d 297 (1987); Recinos v. State, 420 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Catasus v. Tabone, 19 So. 3d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…ly-revealed personal relationship with parties in the lawsuit, the trial judge should have granted a motion for disqualification in this separate case involving those same parties.1 See Steinhorst v. State, 636 So. 2d 498 (Fla.1994); Houck v. State, 669 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). The present application for prohibition requiring his disqualification is therefore granted. [*428] We are certain that issuance of the formal writ will not be necessary. Prohibition granted. . While it is a fact that the tw…
Authorities Cited
- Carroll v. State, 497 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Recinos v. State, 420 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)