THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,

v.

DANIEL E. SCHRAMEK, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Murphy v. Int'l Robotics Sys., Inc., 710 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
  …it less distasteful than other courts. We have reported to the Florida Bar attorneys who made unethical5 argument. The Florida Supreme Court has publicly reprimanded or suspended lawyers for unethical argument. See, e.g., The Florida Bar v. Kelner, 670 So. 2d 62 (Fla.1996); The Florida Bar v. Schaub, 618 So. 2d 202 (Fla.1998). We also know from experience that even when courts do not report counsel to the Bar, the Bar investigates unethical conduct on its own when it reads about it in an opinion. We have co…
• THE Florida BAR v. Rodriguez, 959 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 2007)
  …In contrast to the referee’s finding, this Court has repeatedly refused to find a mitigating factor based on a respondent’s assertion that he engaged in misconduct in order to produce benefits for his client or a third party. See Fla. Bar v. Kelner, 670 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla.1996) (explaining that although an attorney has a duty to zealously represent his clients, this duty does not require that he violate a court order and produce a mistrial); Fla. Bar v. Rendina, 583 So. 2d 314, 316 (Fla.1991) (disbarring att…
• THE Florida BAR v. Ratiner, 238 So. 3d 117 (Fla. 2018)
  …(character or reputation); and (h) (physical or mental disability or impairment ).3 In addition to the above-cited aggravating and mitigating factors, the referee considered the following cases prior to recommending discipline: Fla. Bar v. Kelner , 670 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 1996) ; Fla. Bar v. Wasserman , 675 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 1996) ; Fla. Bar v. Morgan , 938 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 2006) ; Fla. Bar v. Abramson , 3 So. 3d 964 (Fla. 2009) ; Fla. Bar v. Norkin , 132 So. 3d 77 (Fla. 2013) ; Fla. Bar v. Ratiner , 46 So. 3d 3…