ANGELE H. NICHOLS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
HELEN C. PATTERSON, ETC., APPELLEE
ANGELE H. NICHOLS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
HELEN C. PATTERSON, ETC., APPELLEE
670 So. 2d 112
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Anicet v. Gant, 580 So. 2d 273, 275, 277 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 591 So. 2d 181 (Fla.1991); Mujica v. Turner, 582 So. 2d 24, 25 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 592 So. 2d 681 (Fla.1991).
PETERSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Craft, 685 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1996)
-
Mundy v. State, 687 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…ilure to conduct proper Faretta inquiry). However, assuming that a harmless error analysis is appropriate in a case such as this, we conclude that the state has failed to carry its burden to establish that the error was harmless. Cf. Craft v. State, 670 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1st DCA) (failure to inform defendant of right to self-representation after denying motion to discharge appointed counsel based on complaint of incompetence harmless error given overwhelming evidence of guilt and later representations by couns…
Authorities Cited
- Anicet v. Gant, 580 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Mujica v. Turner, 582 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)