KATHY MUSSO, APPELLANT,
v.
CIRO MUSSO, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1996-03-06
No. 95-0421
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
670 So. 2d 122 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution in all respects except for paragraph thirteen thereof. As to that paragraph, we remand for the trial court to consider, without any further hearing, whether the accounts are governed by section 710.112, Florida Statutes (1993). If so, said accounts are to be maintained as custodial accounts with a single custodian. If the court determines said accounts are not governed by said statute, it is to order that they be changed to those where two signatories are permitted. As to the partition, the appellant has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the amendment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(b). Nor has appellant established an abuse of discretion in the trial court’s support and property distribution award.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Salazar v. Giraldo, 190 So. 3d 248 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
    …dment to Former Wife’s pleading, under rule 1.190(b) because Former Husband has not shown how he was prejudiced in presenting his ease or how the -merits of the case were not more effectively .presented by allowing the amendment. See Musso v. Musso, 670 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (affirming the trial court’s order of partition because the appellant failed' to show that' the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the amendment under rule 1.190(b)). Moreover, if, in the amended final judgment, the co…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw