ROBERT VINCENT KING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Affidavit Of Violation Of Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have reviewed the record in accordance with State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla.1987), and found no reversible error apparent on the face of the record.
Appellant’s counsel has pointed out that the written order of revocation of probation does not conform to the court’s oral pronouncement. While the affidavit of violation of probation included three charges, at trial of the underlying charges, appellant was found guilty of only one count. The court announced it would make its findings on revocation of probation consistent with this jury verdict, but the written order of revocation indicates appellant was found to have violated the conditions of probation “as cited in the affidavit,” which contained three charges. We remand for correction of the written order of revocation of probation to conform to the oral finding that appellant violated probation by committing a single aggravated battery.
JOANOS, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Katz v. N.M.E. Hosps., Inc., 842 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…09 So. 2d 1097, 1099-100 (Fla.1987). However, she has failed to make the necessary showing of a departure from the essential requirements of law causing material harm for which there is no adequate remedy on final appeal. See Bared & Co. v. McGuire, 670 So. 2d 158, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)(stating that “[i]t is only if the petition demonstrates harm that cannot be corrected on final appeal that we have the power to exercise discretion to grant or withhold the writ. It must be made, at least prima facie, clear…
-
Nassif v. Amgen Inc., 699 So. 2d 1391 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. See Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire, 670 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) and Parkway Bank v. Fort Myers Armature Works, Inc., 658 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.…
-
ALL About Cruises, Inc. v. Cruise Options, Inc., 889 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…kind of information that “may reasonably cause material injury of an irreparable nature.” Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla.1995) (quoting Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097, 1100 (Fla.1987)); Bared & Co. v. McGuire, 670 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Nonetheless, and applicable to request #7,1 this court generally will not exercise its certiorari review where the objection is that the requested production is vague, overbroad, and irrelevant. Eberhardt v. Eberhardt, 666 So. 2…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987)