WILLIAM DOSTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM DOSTON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
670 So. 2d 193
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse Appellant’s sentence as to count III. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed. The state acknowledges that as to that count the written sentence does not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence. We remand for resentencing to reflect that the mandatory minimum provision as to count III runs consecutive to the mandatory minimum on count I, but that the fifteen year term of sentence imposed in count III is concurrent with the term in count I.
GUNTHER, C.J., and STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Larangera v. State, 686 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…consent before traveling to New Jersey and residing there for a short period of time before returning to Florida. As the order of revocation fails to specify the specific violations found, it must be reversed for that reason alone. Nelson v. State, 670 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Robinson v. State, 609 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). On remand the trial court should therefore make specific findings in writing regarding the change of address charges and determine whether these violations alone warrant revo…
-
Brown v. State, 127 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…ntry of a written order of revocation of probation which, consistent with its oral pronouncement at the hearing, sets forth the conditions of probation that Appellant violated. See Daniels v. State, 45 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Nelson v. State, 670 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Remanded with directions.…