DANIEL ECKHART, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DANIEL ECKHART, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
670 So. 2d 977
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After careful review of the record in this Anders appeal from a plea of nolo contende-re, having found nothing that would arguably constitute reversible error, we affirm the conviction and sentence for violation of probation. We remand, however, to the trial court for entry of a written order of violation of probation, because none appears in the record. See Wood v. State, 653 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Wiggers v. State, 652 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Benton v. State, 652 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Dep't OF Transp. v. Armadillo P'rs, Inc., 849 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2003)…s of the arbor area as contemplated in its cure, and as a result, the court held that the testimony was improperly admitted into evidence. The Fourth District relied on a series of cases from the First District. See State Dep’t of Transp. v. Murray, 670 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), quashed on other grounds, 687 So. 2d 825 (Fla.1997); Williams v. State Dep’t of Transp., 579 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), disapproved in part by Broward County v. Patel, 641 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1994); State Dep’t of Transp. v. Byr…1 / 4
-
Sostchin v. Doll Enters., Inc., 847 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…new trial. 400 So. 2d at 807 (citations omitted). See also Fu Sheng Indus. Co., Ltd. v. T/F Systems, Inc., 690 So. 2d 617, 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(lost profit damages must reflect net profits deducting all costs); State Dept. of Transp. v. Murray, 670 So. 2d 977, 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(determination of lost profits must deduct salary paid to owner/supervisor); State Dept. of Transp. v. Manoly 645 So. 2d 1093, 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)(where salary paid to business owner was not deducted before calculating l…
-
L.N. Murray v. Dep't OF Transp., 687 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1997)…WELLS, Justice. We have for review State Department of Transportation v. Murray, 670 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), in which the district court certified the following questions to be of great public importance: IN AN EMINENT DOMAIN CASE IN WHICH AN ESTABLISHED BUSINESS IS NOT TOTALLY DESTROYED BY A TAKING, DOES SECTION 73.071(3)(b), FLORIDA…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rodriguez v. State, 653 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Wood v. State, 653 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- Johnson v. State, 652 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Clements v. State, 652 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Margolles v. Margolles, 652 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)