PATRICIA SAVERY, APPELLANT,
v.
MYLES SAVERY, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1996-03-06
No. 94-3485
GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
670 So. 2d 1034 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution except for the award of child support which we reverse. On remand we direct that the trial court follow the guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1993); and that it make a specific finding as to the parties’ net incomes, derived from their gross incomes minus the allowable deductions set forth in section 61.30(3). The trial court is reminded that the cost of health care insurance for the minor children is to be added to the basic obligation, not subtracted from it, to determine appellee’s child support obligations. The determination is to be made on the existing record, without an additional hearing.

GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shrove v. Shrove, 724 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …een within this range, the record reveals no evidence that the husband had ever netted that high of an amount. Because support calculations must be based on net income, the trial court’s apparent use of gross figures was error. See Savery v. Savery, 670 So. 2d 1034, 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)(in determining child support, trial court required to make specific findings with regard to parties’ net incomes, derived from gross incomes minus allowable deductions); Warren v. Warren, 629 So. 2d 1079,1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 1…
  • Hindle v. Fuith, 33 So. 3d 782 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
    …Sumlar v. Sumlar, 827 So. 2d 1079, 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (explaining that final judgment must include factual findings sufficiently specific to allow reviewing court to ascertain basis of calculations relating to child support); Savery v. Savery, 670 So. 2d 1034, 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (explaining that to determine child support, trial court required to make specific findings with regard to parties’ net incomes, derived from gross incomes minus allowable deductions). The father also contends that the tri…
  • Alejandra Ivanovich v. Valladarez, 190 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
    …16, 618-19 (Fla. 6th DCA 2001) (“The trial court is required to determine net income based upon section 61.30, Florida Statutes, by determining ‘gross income’ ... and then subtracting from this figure ‘allowable deductions’. ...”); Savery v. Savery, 670 So. 2d 1034, 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (reversing for trial court to “make a specific finding as to the parties’ net incomes, derived from their gross incomes minus the allowable deductions, set forth in section 61.30(3)”). Thus, the lack of findings regarding g…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw