ALEXANDER CHRISTOPHER WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-03-22
No. 95-00233
PARKER, AC.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ, concur.
670 So. 2d 1104 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Alexander Christopher Wilson’s convictions for two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer and one count of resisting an officer with violence. We strike the $2 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because this discretionary cost was not announced at sentencing. Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We also strike the $99 cost/fine that the trial court imposed without providing statutory authority. Sutton v. State, 635 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). In all other respects, we affirm Mr. Wilson’s sentence.

Affirmed as modified.

PARKER, AC.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 68 So. 3d 968 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …ecause the slight delay in appearing at the jail on the day he was to begin serving that term of incarceration was not shown to be a willful and substantial violation, the appellant’s probation should not have been revoked. See e.g. Garcia v. State, 670 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The revocation of the appellant’s probation is therefore reversed, and the sentence imposed upon that revocation is vacated. The case is remanded, with the appellant to be released from that prison sentence. HAWKES, J., Concurs…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw