LORETTA JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-03-27
No. 94-03472
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.
670 So. 2d 1111 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Johnson appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress and the imposition of a fine for the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund. We affirm the denial of her motion to suppress without discussion, and we strike the fine.

The trial court imposed a $15.00 fine for the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund as a condition of Johnson’s probation. In Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), this court found that such fine is not authorized under any statute as a cost or a fine. Consequently, we strike this fine. See Brown v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly D2397, — So. 2d -(Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 25, 1995).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and sentence, and we strike the above mentioned fine.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Summers v. State, 684 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 1996)
    …of great public importance: IS THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ENTER THE WRITTEN FINDINGS REQUIRED BY SECTION 39.059(7)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (1991) AND TROUTMAN V STATU, 680 So. 2d 528 (Fla.1993) COGNIZIBLE COL-' LATERALLY? Summers v. State, 670 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. In Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1993), we held that pursuant to the legislature’s clear mandate, a trial court must consider each of the criteria of section 39.059…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw