W. H. MILTON, ET AL., AS TRUSTEES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
JACKSON COUNTY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
W. H. MILTON, ET AL., AS TRUSTEES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
JACKSON COUNTY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
80 Fla. 516
Florida Supreme Court (1920)
Caution
Also reported at: 86 So. 344
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and brief and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Consalvo v. State, 697 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 1996)…roperty alleged to have been stolen was taken ... the question should be submitted to the jury without any intimation from the trial court as to the force of presumptions of fact arising from ... the testimony.” Curington v. State, 80 Fla. 494, 497, 86 So. 344, 345 (1920). It is improper to give this instruction when its only possible effect is to allow the jury to presume that a defendant is guilty because he was in possession of the property. This goes against the presumption of innocence inherent in ou…
-
Dade Carnley v. State, 82 Fla. 282 (Fla. 1921)…judgment imposing sentence upon him this writ of error was taken. To establish guilt upon this charge proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the property stolen was of the value of twenty dollars or more is required. Curington v. State, 80 Fla. 494, 86 South. Rep. 344; Whitehead v. State, 20 Fla. 841; Francis v. State, 87 Miss. 493, 39 South. Rep. 897. In the absence of such evidence 'the charge is not proved and a verdict finding the accused guilty of such crime should not be permitted to stand. There is compete…
-
Khalil Burshan, M.D. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. OF Pittsburgh, 805 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…erly things movable, which may be carried about by the owner; such as animals, household stuff, money, jewels, coin, garments, and everything else that can be put in motion and transferred from one place to another. Curington v. State, 80 Fla. 494, 86 So. 344, 345 (1920) (quoting 1 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 315). A survey of Florida law reveals that the trespass cause of action has been applied to chattels such as a black mare,7 logs,8 a wagon and mule,9 clothing,10 crates of pears,11 and an automobile,12…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence