JOE CHANDLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1996-04-17
No. 94-2498
DELL, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
671 So. 2d 875 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction. We reverse, however, the order of restitution for $5,494.20. At appellant’s sentencing, the trial court reserved ruling on the amount of restitution until a hearing could be conducted on such. Nevertheless, the trial court entered the restitution order without affording appellant an opportunity to be heard on the matter. The state concedes the trial court erred. See Roundtree v. State, 661 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Accordingly, the restitution order is reversed without prejudice to enter another order after conducting a restitution hearing.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw