STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
JOHN T. MINCEY, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1996-04-18
No. 86177
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
672 So. 2d 524 Florida Supreme Court (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court held that section 827.05 of the Florida Statutes, the negligent treatment of children statute, remains unconstitutionally vague despite legislative amendments adding language about financial ability and environmental conditions. The Court rejected the State's argument that these amendments cured the constitutional defect previously identified in State v. Winters.


Holding

The Court held that section 827.05 remains unconstitutionally vague. The amendments adding "though financially able" and language addressing environmental conditions do not clarify the prohibited conduct and fail to provide fair notice to parents and others of what behavior will subject them to criminal sanctions.


Headnotes

[1] A statute criminalizing the negligent treatment of children is unconstitutionally vague if it fails to provide adequate guidelines for prohibited conduct.

[2] Amendments to a statute previously declared unconstitutionally vague do not cure the vagueness defect if they fail to clarify the prohibited conduct.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“unconstitutionally vague, indefinite and overbroad”

The Court's characterization of the original section 827.05 statute in State v. Winters

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

John T. Mincey was charged under section 827.05 after his 5-year-old stepson was found wandering the streets late at night. Mincey moved to dismiss th…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Mincey, 658 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal held section 827.05, Florida Statutes (1991), unconstitutional and certified the following question to be of great public importance:

WHETHER THE ADDITION OF LANGUAGE ADDRESSING FINANCIAL ABILITY AND A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT AND SIGNIFICANT IMPAIRMENT OF THE CHILD’S PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL HEALTH IN SECTION 827.05 AMOUNTS TO A WILLFUL INTENT OR SCIENTER REQUIREMENT SUFFICIENT TO OVERCOME THE HOLDING IN WINTERS.[

]

658 So. 2d at 598-99. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, §§ 3(b)(1) & (4) of the Florida Constitution. For the reasons expressed below, we approve the decision under review.

Mincey was charged with violating section 827.05,- Florida Statutes (1991), after his 5-year-old stepson was found wandering the streets late at night. Mincey moved to dismiss the charges based on this Court’s decision in State v. Winters, 346 So. 2d 991 (Fla.1977), which held section 827.05, Florida Statutes (1975), unconstitutional. Agreeing that Mincey had been charged under an unconstitutional statute, the county court dismissed the charges and certified its decision to the district court. The district court affirmed, concluding that section 827.05 remains unconstitutional. We agree.

In Winters, this Court declared section 827.05, Florida Statutes (1975), Florida’s negligent treatment of children statute, “unconstitutionally vague, indefinite and overbroad.” Winters 346 So. 2d at 994. The following year, the Court clarified its holding in Winters, explaining that section 827.05 was unconstitutionally vague because it criminalized the negligent treatment of children without adequate guidelines. State v. Joyce, 361 So. 2d 406, 407 (Fla.1978) (in the face of a vagueness challenge, the Court upheld section 827.04(2), Florida’s simple criminal child abuse statute, which prohibits the willful or culpably negligent deprivation of necessary food, clothing, shelter or medical treatment).

When struck down as unconstitutional in Winters, section 827.05 read in pertinent part:

Negligent Treatment of Children. — Whoever negligently deprives a child of, or allows a child to be deprived of, necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree....

§ 827.05, Fla.Stat. (1975).

In 1977, the legislature amended section 827.05 by adding the underscored language: Negligent Treatment of Children. — Whoever, though financially able, negligently deprives a child of, or allows a child to be deprived of, necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment or permits a child to live in an environment when such deprivation or environment causes the child’s physical or emotional health to be significantly impaired or is in danger of being significantly impaired shall be is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree....”

Ch. 77-429, § 2, at 1747, Laws of Fla. (amending § 827.05, Fla.Stat. (1975)). The only substantive changes made by the legislature was to add the words, “though financially able” and “or permits a child to live in an environment, when such deprivation or environment causes the child’s physical or emotional health to be significantly impaired or is in danger of being significantly impaired,” to the text that was held unconstitutional in Winters. The addition of these words does not clarify the type of conduct that is prohibited under the statute. "Whatever the reason for the additions, they simply do not correct the vagueness problem recognized in Winters and Joyce.

As did the 1975 version of the statute, the amended statute fails to give parents and others susceptible to child abuse charges fair notice of what type of behavior will subject them to criminal sanctions under the statute. Accordingly, because the statute remains unconstitutionally vague, we approve the decision under review.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. . State v. Winters, 346 So. 2d 991 (Fla.1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sieniarecki v. State, 756 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2000)
    …(declaring former section 827.05, Florida Statutes (1975) to be unconstitutionally vague, indefinite and overbroad, on the basis that it criminalized simple negligent conduct which was neither willful nor culpably negligent); accord State v. Mincey, 672 So. 2d 524 (Fla.1996) (involving invalidation for vagueness of amended section 827.05, Florida Statutes [*74] (1991), where the amended provision continued to criminalize simple negligent conduct). ... However, the second such statute, which proscribed “simpl…
  • Arnold v. State, 755 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
    …991 (Fla.1977). The 1991 version of section 827.05 had added language addressing the financial ability of the caregiver and the degree of impairment or risk to the child, but those elements did not overcome the lack of scienter. See State v. Mincey, 672 So. 2d 524 (Fla.1996); State v. Ayers, 665 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The latest version of the statute, under which Mr. [*798] Arnold was convicted, has attempted to remedy that shortcoming by adding the “willfully or by culpable negligence” language and…
  • Burns v. State, 132 So. 3d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
    …991 (Fla.1977). The 1991 version of section 827.05 had added language addressing the financial ability of the caregiver and the degree of impairment or risk to the child, but those elements did not overcome the lack of scienter. See State v. Mincey, 672 So. 2d 524 (Fla.1996); State v. Ayers, 665 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The latest version of the statute, under which Mr. Arnold was convicted, has attempted to remedy that shortcoming by adding the “willfully or by culpable negligence” language and has fur…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw