WENDY BECKER, APPELLANT,
v.
CARL IMMICH, APPELLEE
WENDY BECKER, APPELLANT,
CARL IMMICH, APPELLEE
672 So. 2d 658
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Russenberger v. Rus-senberger, 669 So. 2d 1044 (Fla.1996).
STONE, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. State, 677 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…248, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991). We addressed the propriety of the prosecutor’s comments during closing argument in the trial of appellant and his co-defendants in Knight v. State, 672 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) and Bacon v. State, 672 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). In Knight, we held that the totality of the prosecutor’s improper comments went to the very heart of the case and required a new trial. As in Knight, we conclude that appellant’s case must be reversed and remanded for a new tria…
Authorities Cited
- Russenberger v. Russenberger, 669 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1996)