RANDALL ALAN WAINWRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RANDALL ALAN WAINWRIGHT, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
672 So. 2d 659
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The assessment of “other court costs” in the amount of $50.00, without reference to any statutory authority is stricken. See Bradshaw v. State, 638 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). On remand, the trial court may reimpose such discretionary costs as are authorized by statute, either with reference to proper statutory authority or with a specific explanation as to what the cost assessment represents. In all other respects, the judgment and sentences are affirmed.
ALLEN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nehrke v. State, 683 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…g a jury trial. As to his first and second issues, we affirm. As to the third issue, we strike the “fine and costs in the amount of $500” and remand in accordance with Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc), Wainwright v. State, 672 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), Bradshaw v. State, 638 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (order must cite proper statutory basis for assessment of costs), and Raimondo v. State, 666 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (striking order imposing “court costs of $100.00”…
Authorities Cited
- Torey Bradshaw and Alford R. Martin v. State, 638 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)