WILLIE ROGERS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-04-17
No. 94-2127
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GREEN, JJ.
673 So. 2d 92 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Of the several points raised on this appeal from convictions on two counts of first degree murder and related charges, the only one with even arguable merit presents no more than harmless error. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Harvey v. State, 11 So. 3d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …from the trial court’s summary denial of Harvey’s motion to reset the time for filing a rule 3.850 petition. See, e.g., Duque v. State, 983 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (treating petition for mandamus as a notice of appeal); accord Reddick v. Lando, 673 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). The trial court should have considered that an un-counseled prisoner held in an out-of-state jurisdiction who is not represented by counsel and who does not have access to Florida legal materials has been deprived of meaningful a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw