GEORGE E. IMPERATORE, APPELLANT,

v.

NATIONSBANK OF FLORIDA, N.A., THE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CITIZENS & SOUTHERN NATIONAL SAVINGS BANK OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Am. Express Travel Related Servs., Inc. v. Cruz, 761 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …ed to be proprietary and confidential trade secret information without first conducting an in camera hearing and inspection and failing to make specific findings of fact concerning the trade secret objections); Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings, 673 So. 2d 131, 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)(granting petition for certiorari, quashing the trial court’s order compelling production and remanding to trial court with instructions to conduct an in camera inspection of the manual in question or alternatively an evident…
• Harley Shipbuilding Corp. & Howard Harley v. Fast Cats Ferry Serv., LLC., 820 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
  …ts without conducting an in camera inspection or holding any kind of hearing on the objections to their production, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law. See Salick, 722 So. 2d 944; Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings, 673 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Contrary to Fast Cats’ assertion in response to this petition, this is not the kind of case where preparation of a privilege log is required. Cf. TIG Ins. Corp. of Am. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In TIG the…
• Ameritrust Ins. Corp. v. O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc., 899 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
  …4th DCA 2000). The first determination will usually require the court to conduct an in camera inspection of the materials to determine whether they contain trade secrets. Salick Health Care, 722 So. 2d at 946; Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings, 673 So. 2d 131, 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Rare Coin-It, 625 So. 2d at 1278-79. Even if production is ordered, a court must set forth its pertinent findings. Sheridan Healthcorp, 770 So. 2d at 222. In this case, the trial court departed from the essential requireme…

Authorities Cited

• United States Fid. & Guar. v. Martin Cnty., 669 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)