SIME MICHAEL DADIC AND MARGARET Z. DADIC, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
MANUAL FARACH; LAW FIRM OF BRACKETT, COOK, SNED, WELCH, HEWITT, D'ANGIO & TUCKER; HAROLD S. STEVENS; AND LAW FIRM OF PETERS, ROBERTSON, LAX, PARSONS AND WELCHER, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
PER CURIAM.
Appellants appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their amended complaint, seeking to vacate a judgment entered in a separate action. Appellants’ claim is based on allegations of Appellees’ “fraud on the court” in the other case. We affirm.
Viewing the allegations and making all inferences most favorably to Appellants, it is clear they alleged only intrinsic fraud, not extrinsic. Nor did Appellants demonstrate how they could further amend the complaint to state extrinsic fraud. Therefore, the trial court did not err in dismissing with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. De-Claire v. Yohanan, 453 So. 2d 375 (Fla.1984); Wescott v. Wescott, 444 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
As to Appellees’ cross-appeal, we also affirm.
GLICKSTEIN, STONE and GROSS, JJ.„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. R.R., 697 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…’s decision resolving legal questions are subject to de novo review, while factual decisions by the trial court are entitled to deference commensurate with the trial judge’s superior vantage point for resolving factual disputes. See Wilson v. State, 673 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 682 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 1996); State v. Setzler, 667 So. 2d 343, 344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The Supreme Court has characterized the Fourth Amendment limits of search-and-seizure power as intended “to prevent arbitrary and…
-
State v. Pruitt, 967 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…ger’s possession posed a quantifiable risk to the safety of the officers executing the warrant; therefore, this exigent circumstance permitted the police to enter Singer’s home, without first knocking and announcing their presence. Wilson v. State, 673 So. 2d 505, 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). In its order, the trial court likened the freshness of the information regarding Pruitt’s suspected use of an AK-47 in a homicide to the requirement of temporal proximity of information necessary for issuance of a search w…
-
Leangelo Kellom v. State, 849 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…iple forms a part of the Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry. Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927, 930, 115 S.Ct. 1914, 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995). The knock and announce rule has been recognized as a part of the common law of Florida. Wilson v. State, 673 So. 2d 505, 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The Florida Legislature codified the knock and announce rule in section 933.09, which provides as follows: The officer may break open any outer door, inner door or window of a house, or any part of a house or anything [*39…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- DeCLAIRE v. Yohanan, 453 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1984)
- Wescott v. Wescott, 444 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)