KEITH EDWARD SUMMERLIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1996-05-20
No. 95-3573
MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
673 So. 2d 558 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an inmate in the state correctional system, seeks review of an order denying his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion on the merits. “[W]hen the denial is not predicated on the legal insufficiency of the motion on its face, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the order.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850(d). Because no portion of the record is attached to the trial court’s order, we reverse, and remand with directions that the trial court either attach that portion of the record which conclusively shows that appellant is entitled to no relief, or take other appropriate action, as contemplated by rule 3.850(d).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hosp. Correspondence Corp. v. McRAE, 682 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
    …factual support for or the legal insufficiency of its affirmative defenses. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c); Delandro v. America’s Mortgage Servicing, Inc., 674 So. 2d 184, 186-87 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Johnson v. Claims Prevention & Management Servs., Inc., 673 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Gulf Ins. Co. v. Stofman, 664 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); see also Knight Energy Servs., Inc. v. Amoco Oil Co., 660 So. 2d 786, 788 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), review denied, 670 So. 2d 937 (Fla.1996); Board of Trustees of the Int…
  • Hinton v. Brooks, 820 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
    …kses, were not entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. Affirmative defenses based on allegations of - fraud are generally considered valid defenses to a mortgage foreclosure action. Johnson v. Claims Prevention & Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 673 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Norris v. Paps, 615 So. 2d 735, 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (citing Lake Region Hotel Co. v. Gollick, 110 Fla. 324, 149 So. 204 (1933)); see also Najera v. Nationsbank Trust Co., N.A., 707 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Moreover, a…
  • Dotter v. Tex. Commerce Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 679 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
    …he affirmative defenses, demonstrated their legal insufficiency, or liquidated the amount of statutory or actual damages that would have partially offset the debt owed to appellee. See, e.g., Johnson v. Claims Prevention & Management Services, Inc., 673 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., and GROSSMAN, MELVIN B., Associate Judge, eoncur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw