KENNETH G. GOFF, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH G. GOFF, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
673 So. 2d 990
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion in the trial court with the verification required by Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987 within thirty days. See Weisman v. State, 651 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
The motion in this case does not appear to be facially defective, but for the absence of verification, in its allegations with respect to appellant’s plea agreement, counsel’s representations to the court with respect to same and counsel’s calculations as to sentence.
GLICKSTEIN, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. State, 686 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…n are otherwise legally sufficient, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his motion for post-conviction relief in compliance with the requirements of rule 3.850(c) within thirty days of this court’s mandate. See Goff v. State, 673 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Reese v. State, 518 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Morais v. State, 640 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.…
-
Huesca v. State, 841 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…The unlawful manufacture of marijuana is not one of the enumerated offenses contained in the statute.1 Therefore, the trial court erred when it ordered the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to revoke Huesca’s license. See Lee v. State, 673 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Finally, Huesca argues that the trial court improperly imposed discretionary costs pursuant to section 939.18(l)(b), Florida Statues (2001). This court previously has held that “the [trial] court is obligated to consider the de…
-
Troya v. State, 817 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…’s unsworn motion for post-conviction relief, but do so without prejudice to Appellant refiling his motion for post-conviction relief in compliance with the requirements of rule 3.850(c) within thirty days of this court’s mandate. See Goff v. State, 673 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Reese v. State, 518 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); [*933] Morais v. State, 640 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Weisman v. State, 651 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)