FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR FIRST AMERICAN BANK & TRUST, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL W. LEVINE AND MARCIA L. LEVINE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The FDIC as receiver for First American Bank appealed a trial court decision denying it the right to repudiate a 1987 deed in lieu of foreclosure agreement with the Levines. The appellate court affirmed orders requiring the FDIC to release escrowed funds and affirmed a contempt finding against the FDIC, but reversed sanctions imposed against the FDIC's counsel.
The court reversed the trial court's finding that the FDIC could repudiate the agreement under 12 U.S.C. section 1821(e), affirmed orders requiring the FDIC to release escrowed funds, affirmed the contempt finding against the FDIC itself, but reversed the sanctions imposed against the FDIC's counsel due to lack of proper procedural safeguards.
[1] The statutory repudiation provisions of 12 U.S.C. …
[2] A trial court may properly order the release of escrowed funds when a party voluntarily dismisses its appeal of an award related to those funds.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“this court reversed and held that the statutory repudiation provisions of 12 U.S.C. section 1821(e) were not available to the FDIC with respect to the 1987 agreement”
Establishes that the FDIC lacked authority to repudiate the deed in lieu agreement despite its receiver status
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn 1987, the Levines entered into a deed in lieu of foreclosure agreement with First American Bank regarding three properties. The Levines later sued …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions Against Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We sua sponte consolidate case nos. 95-1479 and 95-1483.
This consolidated appeal stems from a suit filed by the Levines against First American Bank and Trust (FABT) seeking $300,000 in damages for breach of a 1987 deed in lieu of foreclosure agreement entered by the Le-vines and FABT regarding three separate properties: (1) an improved lot; (2) an unimproved lot; and (3) the Oakbrook Circle residence. The complaint was amended to add a claim for equitable lien and constructive trust on proceeds of the sale of the Oakbrook Circle property. Subsequently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was appointed as receiver for FABT and substituted as a party in this ease. The FDIC counterclaimed alleging repudiation of the 1987 agreement and sought recovery for the Levines’ use and occupancy of the Oakbrook Circle residence.
The trial court’s final judgment determined that the FDIC had the right to repudiate the 1987 agreement pursuant to 12 U.S.C. section 1821(e); granted the FDIC possession of the Oakbrook Circle residence; required the Levines to pay the FDIC for use and occupancy of the Oakbrook Circle residence; and awarded the Levines a $300,-000 unsecured claim against the receivership estate for failure of the Bank to pay portions of the sale price for the two lots. The Le-vines appealed the final judgment on the award to the FDIC, and the FDIC cross-appealed the $300,000 award to the Levines, but later voluntarily dismissed its cross-ap peal. Therefore, the $300,000 award to the Levines became final. On the main appeal, this court reversed and held that the statutory repudiation provisions of 12 U.S.C. section 1821(e) were not available to the FDIC with respect to the 1987 agreement. Levine v. F.D.I.C., 651 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 660 So. 2d 713 (Fla.1995).
In case no. 95-1483, the trial court later entered two non-final orders: an April 19, 1995 order directing the FDIC to release monies held in escrow to the Levines and an April 27, 1995 order denying the FDIC’s motion to stay the effect of the April 19,1995 order or to extend time to comply. We affirm these orders. The FDIC voluntarily dismissed its cross-appeal of the award of $300,000 to the Levines. Therefore, the trial court properly ordered the FDIC to release the funds. Moreover, the supreme court has denied the FDIC’s petition for review of the main appeal. See F.D.I.C. v. Levine, 660 So. 2d 713 (Fla.1995).
In case no. 93-1479, we affirm the finding of contempt against the FDIC. However, we reverse that part of the trial court’s order imposing sanctions against the FDIC’s counsel. No basis for contempt against counsel existed because the FDIC’s counsel had not refused to comply with the court’s order. The trial court also erred in imposing sanctions without affording the FDIC’s counsel an opportunity to be heard and to offer mitigating or extenuating evidence. See Lahti v. Porn, 624 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Kuechenberg v. Creative Interiors, Inc., 424 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Insua v. World Wide Air, Inc., 582 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART.
GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Insua v. World Wide AIR, Inc., 582 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Freddy Charles Green v. State, 424 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
- Lahti v. Porn, 624 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
- Levine v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. for First Am. Bank & Tr., 651 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)