CARL LEE BRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CARL LEE BRIGHT, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
675 So. 2d 260
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed, but strike the imposition of public defender’s fees because the record does not establish that appellant was advised of his right to contest the amount of the fee. See Allmond v. State, 668 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of the fee after compliance with Rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
JUDGMENT and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; and REMANDED.
PETERSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. State, 686 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Since Jones was not advised that he could contest the amount of the Public Defender’s lien, we reverse the lien and remand for further consideration after compliance with Rule 3.720(d)(1). See Bright v. State, 675 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED. COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Allmond v. State, 668 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)