YUDAH AMIT, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSHUA A. POPKIN, APPELLEE
YUDAH AMIT, APPELLANT,
JOSHUA A. POPKIN, APPELLEE
675 So. 2d 261
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
GENDEN, MICHAEL A., Associate Judge.
This is an appeal following a jury verdict in favor of the appellee/plaintiff. The appellant was the defendant/counter-plaintiff below. The complaint filed by the appellee alleged that the appellant fraudulently induced him to enter into an agreement to have two boats constructed on behalf of the appellee by the appellant. There being no evidence to support a prior fraudulent intent not to perform under the agreement, we reverse the jury award and remand to the trial court to enter judgment for the defendant. We affirm the trial court’s granting of a directed verdict on the counterclaim.
KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Milanick v. Osborne, 6 So. 3d 729 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…fees and costs incurred in defending against the ethics complaint. This includes proving entitlement to and the amount of those costs and [*731] fees, including fees and expenses incurred after the administrative hearing. See Kaminsky v. Lieberman, 675 So. 2d 261, 262 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Osborne’s invoices for legal fees in exhibits 6 and 7 reflect services rendered in connection with the supreme court proceeding and the administrative hearing. We hold that Osborne is entitled to an award of attorney’s fee…