ELMER SANCHEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1996-06-26
No. 95-3132
GUNTHER, C.J., and KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
675 So. 2d 263 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, but remand because the written order did not set forth both of the specific violations found, although they were orally stated. Robinson v. State, 609 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

GUNTHER, C.J., and KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
    …However, on remand the trial court is directed to enter an amended order revoking community control, stating the terms and conditions of community control that have been violated. Houston v. State, 688 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Sanchez v. State, 675 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Vezina v. State, 667 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Robinson v. State, 609 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Frazier v. State, 571 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Clark v. State,…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw