ANTHONY NOBLE WIDEMOND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1996-05-28
No. 95-1110
MINER and MICKLE, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.
675 So. 2d 632 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Dennis v. State, 673 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Burley v. State, 402 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), disapproved of on other grounds, State v. Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013 (Fla.1984).

MINER and MICKLE, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Telisia Shaonte Kelley v. Rice, 800 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
    …ay as Ms. Kelley, forty-nine days into his jail term. . While Judge Downey could certainly take judicial notice of the subpoena and return of service in the court file, he could not take judicial notice of the fact of service. See Cordova v. State, 675 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). . These cases may be distinguishable from the instant case in that they may have involved situations where the defendant was ordered by the trial judge to appear at a later date. Therefore, the trial judge would have had persona…
  • Davidian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, 178 So. 3d 45 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
    …d into evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” § 90.801(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). The trial court properly rejected this , challenge. The exception to hearsay for public records applies to the returns of service here. See Cordova v. State, 675 So. 2d 632, 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (holding that a return of service was hearsay but admissible under the public [*48] records exception in section 90.803(8), Florida Statutes). The Bank also contends that the returns of service were admissible on the alterna…
  • Mills v. State, 681 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …In sum, the trial court’s ultimate ruling precluding Mills’ counsel from questioning Detective Oterino did not result in error. We affirm the trial court as having reached the right result, albeit in part on a different basis. See Cordova v. State, 675 So. 2d 632, 636 (Fla. 3d DCA1996). Affirmed. . We use the term "extrinsic evidence,” in the context of this case, to mean evidence that necessitates that another witness be called for its introduction. See generally Carter v. Hewitt, 617 F. 2d 961 (3d Cir.19…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw