MARY ROBISHAW, APPELLANT,
v.
MOBIL OIL CORP. AND AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, APPELLEES
BARFIELD, Chief Judge.
Having considered carefully the issues raised on appeal, we find no merit in those issues with the exception of the claim of appellant that the judge of compensation claims erred in not authorizing payment of Dr. Kulick’s bill. • The compensation order is silent as to the issue of Dr. Kulick’s bill, and while it may be considered that the judge denied payment by implication because he found the service unrelated to the industrial accident, we are unable to accept that argument on the face of the record. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the judge of compensation claims for a specific finding and determination with respect to Dr. Kulick’s bill. Otherwise, the decision of the judge of compensation claims is Affirmed.
KAHN, J., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Est. OF Norma J. Johnson v. Badger Acquisition OF Tampa LLC, 983 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)…y owed to Mrs. Johnson by the consultant pharmacist. (3) Other Judicial Precedent The Estate calls our attention to the conflict certified in Powers v. Thobhani, 903 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), with Estate of Sharp and Johnson v. Walgreen Co., 675 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The Estate argues that the trial court in Powers, relying on Estate of Sharp, also failed to note the distinction between a consultant pharmacist and a retail pharmacist. Our supreme court at first granted review, Your Druggist,…
-
Alyce M. Sanderson v. Eckerd Corp., 780 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…POWELL, R., Associate Judge. Appellant appeals from a final order dismissing Count Three of her third amended complaint with prejudice. The trial court concluded that because of the holding in Johnson v. Walgreen Co., 675 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996),1 the voluntary assumption of duty doctrine, sometimes referred to as the voluntary undertaking doctrine, does not apply to a retail pharmacy and pharmacist dispensing prescription drugs in Florida, but that if it did, the third…
-
Est. OF Edna Marie Sharp v. Omnicare, Inc., 879 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…e rise to the claims for damages being made by the Estate. For example, the Estate argues that Chapter 465, Florida Statutes (2002) (the Florida Pharmacy Act), imposes some duty on Omnicare to Ms. Sharp that was breached. In Johnson v. Walgreen Co., 675 So. 2d 1036, 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), however, the court held there that Chapter 465 is “within the regulatory scheme for pharmacists,” and does not create a private cause of action. Cf., McFarland & Son, Inc. v. Basel, 727 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). No c…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence