JOE R. PAYTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1996-07-03
No. 95-3810
STONE, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
675 So. 2d 1043 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction and sentence, but remand for the trial court to amend the judgment by deleting reference to two alleged violations of probation which were dropped at the revocation hearing; that Appellant moved without consent and that his whereabouts were unknown.

STONE, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Carle v. State, 983 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
    …with violating section 893.13(l)(a) by possessing a controlled substance with intent to sell, a lesser included instruction on simple possession is required to be given if requested. See State v. Abreau, 363 So. 2d 1063 (Fla.1978); Wilcox v. State, 675 So. 2d 1043, 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Rogers v. State, 626 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). But the state maintains that simple possession of diazepam is not a lesser included offense of possession with intent to sell diazepam, because both charges are third-d…
  • Ewing v. State, 56 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
    …deliver). In examining the elements of the offense, it is clear that the crime of possession of any drug is an offense that is fully subsumed within the elements of the crime of possession of the drug with intent to sell. See, e.g., Wilcox v. State, 675 So. 2d 1043, 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“Patently, one cannot be convicted of possession with intent to sell under section 893.13(l)(a) if all the elements of possession are not met.”). Given that simple possession in this context is the next lesser-included off…
  • Murphy v. State, 684 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
    …ssion is — you can figure it out. If it is intent to sell, deliver or manufacture, it is simple possession and exercising control. I’ll tell you about it again if you want me to. Okay. They don’t want me to. In the recent case of Wilcox v. State, 675 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), this court held that where a defendant is charged with violating section 893.13(l)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), by possessing with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver a controlled substance, a lesser-included instructio…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw