DERRICK TYRONE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Consecutive Mandatory Minimum Sentences cases and more on FLexlaw
[*12] PER CURIAM.
Derrick Tyrone Williams appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We have jurisdiction. See Sellers v. State, 591 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We affirm the denial of Williams’ claim regarding consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. However, the trial court failed to address Williams’ claim that his sentences do not conform to the oral pronouncement at sentencing. Accordingly, as to this claim only, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to review the record and determine whether there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentences.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.
THREADGILL, C.J., and BLUE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cynthia Ann Dawson/Knapp v. State, 698 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…law.” King v. State, 681 So. 2d 1136, 1140 (Fla.1996). See also Davis v. State, 661 So. 2d 1193 (Fla.1995). In reviewing Knapp’s motion to correct an illegal sentence, the majority opinion relies upon two of this court’s opinions, Williams v. State, 676 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), and Sellers v. State, 591 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). In Williams, this court reviewed a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.800 and reversed and remanded the ease with directions to the trial court to review the record and determ…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Sellers v. State, 591 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)