ESTABAN SOSA, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Traman D. Tory v. State, 686 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …distinct from probation and community control since it is defined separately in section 948.001, Florida Statutes (1993), and, therefore, was required to be orally pronounced. We reject this argument. As recognized by this court in Mosley v. State, 677 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), reh’g denied, (August 16,1996): Section 948.01(13)(a) provides that drug offender probation “may include those measures normally associated with community control.” Therefore, like a defendant placed on regular probation or com…
• Houston v. State, 701 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …d, the Fourth District has stricken a portion of this condition on one occasion and refused to strike it on two others. See Tory v. State, 686 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Hornberger v. State, 677 So. 2d 1384 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Mosley v. State, 677 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See also Vasquez v. [*375] State, 663 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (pre-Hart ease striking condition four because it was not orally pronounced). The other districts have apparently not stricken this condition since the Hart d…
• Edmond A. Welborn v. State, 687 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …hority to an administrative agency. We reject Welbom’s argument that conditions which pertain to “probation” and “community control” do not apply to “drug offender probation.” See Tory v. State, 686 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Mosley v. State, 677 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Thus, we find that conditions (1) through (8) are statutorily imposed conditions and are contained in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.986(e). These conditions need not be orally pronounced. See State v. Hart, 668 So. 2d 589…