STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
GERALD M. TROTTER, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
GERALD M. TROTTER, APPELLEE
677 So. 2d 35
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
GOSHORN, Judge.
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(4)(A), we accept the following certified question from the county court as one of great public importance:
WHETHER SECTION 454.23, FLORIDA STATUTES (1995) IS VOID AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE?
In answering this question in the negative, we align ourselves with the First District Court of Appeal and adopt the reasoning of Judge Mickle’s scholarly opinion in State v. Foster, — So. 2d -, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D533 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 28,1996).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
DAUKSCH and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kelly v. SUN & SEA Ests., Ltd., Inc., 681 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…tten findings in support of its order, we are constrained to reverse the order under review and remand with instructions to the court to make the requisite findings outlined in Kinney. Banco De La Construccion, S.A. v. Inversiones Y Commercio, Inc., 677 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). In reconsidering this motion in the aftermath of Kinney however, we remind the court below of the further admonition made by the supreme court: Where new or renewed motions for forum non conveniens dismissal are prompted in such…
-
Banco Cont'l, S.A. v. Transcom Bank (Barbados), Ltd., 922 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…burden of showing that the constitutional minimum contacts requirement was met, it concluded that, in the absence of further elucidation from this court, it was bound by the holding in Banco De La Construccion, S.A. v. Inversiones Y Commercio, Inc., 677 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). The trial court correctly noted that the Construcción opinion did not discuss or address the constitutional due process requirement for personal jurisdiction. Continental appeals from a non-final order denying its motion to dism…