DAVID SANDERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the defendant's convictions but remanded for correction of the written sentencing documents to align with oral pronouncements.
The defendant was convicted of possession of cocaine and possession of cocaine and paraphernalia in two separate cases. The trial court consolidated t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Public Defender Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on consolidated appeal from Sanders’ convictions for possession of cocaine (lower ease no. 94-969) and possession of cocaine and paraphernalia (lower case no. 94-902). We affirm without comment the trial court’s adjudications of guilt in both cases.
However, as for Sanders’ sentences, we remand with directions that the trial court conform the written sentencing documents to its oral pronouncements (or lack thereof) at the sentencing hearing.1 Specifically, we direct the trial court to: 1. Conform the written sentencing documents to its oral pronouncement that all of Sanders’ sentences would run concurrently, and that he would receive credit for time served, Taylor v. State, 425 So. 2d 1191, 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983);
2. Allow Sanders notice and an opportunity to be heard on the amount of his public defender fee, Kirby v. State, 658 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); and
3. Strike Sanders’ special conditions of probation that were not specifically pronounced at sentencing (i.e., conditions 11,12 and 15). State v. Hart, 668 So. 2d 589 (Fla.1996).
JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED; SENTENCES REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
BOOTH, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur. . Per Sanders' motion, the trial court addressed sentencing in both cases in a single consolidated sentencing hearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Hart, 668 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 1996)
- Taylor v. State, 425 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- Thelonious W. Kirby v. State, 658 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)